From Tragedy There Comes Absurdity Part 1
After some time off, Bonbon Confetti Artillery is back and will hopefully be updated at least weekly. More updates on real stuff going on in my life later (including pics from this year's New York Comic Con and a visual tour of my room), but the first post after a long hiatus is a comment on the tragedy that's dominated the news.
Yes, I'm going to talk about the shootings at Virginia Tech.
Heroes and Ideologue Leeches
It's good to know that after a major tragedy we put aside blame and our personal differences in order to come together and... Oh, that entire "put aside our differences" thing didn't happen, did it? No, not at all... Damn.After the best and highest qualities in humanity were displayed in the sacrifice made by Virginia Tech professor Liviu Librescu--who saved his students by blocking the door of his classroom from gunman Seung-Hui Cho--the pundits and bloviators come from the woodwork to place the blame on other individuals or entities.
It seems like the cynical lesson to be learned from the aftermath of the Virginia Tech shooting is that there are leeches in the world, opportunists whose commitment to their own narrow ideology trumps common decency. This lack of decency allows them to sop up the still-wet blood from the ground in order to flavor their agendas.
"I think it's all the damn libruls"
First you have several conservatives blaming liberals and liberalism for the shootings at Virginia Tech, which shows you just how mature and reasonable political discourse in this country really is. Michelle Malkin, by inference, suggested in one of her blog posts that liberalism caused none of the students at Virginia Tech to fight back against Cho. From what I understand from a message board I frequent, a guest on Neal Boortz's radio show wondered why students didn't throw desks at Cho or try to tackle him, blaming liberal institutions for (for lack of a better word) the pussification of students.In most cases I would find this tough-guy posturing quite funny, but second guessing murder victims like this isn't my idea of comedy. These are people who are suddenly being shot at, who are likely unaware if there are multiple gunmen or a single gunman and if the shooter or shooters have other weapons apart from guns. These are people who amid the chaos and intense fear of the situation are unsure if they will survive. Yet there are some who have the temerity to demand them to play action movie star and, by inference, deride them for their failure to be a no-nonsense protagonist from a summer action movie. Surely not all of us harbor an inner John McClane, one that can coolly say "Yippy kay yay, mother fucker" when the time to ice the bad guy is right. It's callous, but I wonder if in a similar situation Malkin would expect her daughters to beat down Alan Rickman's posse of European thugs.
Following the shootings at Columbine, Newt Gingrich said "I accuse [the elite news media, liberal academic elite, and the liberal political elite] in Littleton of being afraid to talk about the mess you have made and being afraid to take the responsibility for the things that you have done, and instead foisting on the rest of us pathetic banalities because you don't have the courage to look at the world you have created." Gingrich has reaffirmed that statement in regards to the Virginia Tech tragedy when he appeared on This Week with George Stephanopoulos.
To Gingrich, I state the following: I accuse the simple-minded partisan ideologues in this country of being afraid to talk about the tragedy that has occurred and being afraid to assign responsibility to the person who actually did the shooting, and instead foisting on the rest of us pathetic banalities because the partisan hacks don't have the courage to look at the complexities of the world we live in.
Video Games, Movies, You Know the Drill by Now
The night of the shooting, Dr. Phil was on Larry King Live, a show proven to be an effective sedative and suppository in various peer-reviewed lab studies. Anyways, Dr. Phil (whose credentials are more suspect than Dr. Teeth of The Electric Mayhem Band) opined that video games and violent movies were partly to blame for the Virginia Tech tragedy. Gingrich similarly blamed video games and movies for the coarsening of morality in this country and hence the rise in violence. He also blamed atheism and pimp and ho Halloween costumes for 10-year-olds for the debased morality of the nation. I'll touch on the atheism bit in part 2, particularly in a blog post by dingleberry Dinesh D'Souza. I don't know if I'll touch the pimp and ho costume thing since I'm pretty sure I haven't seem a pimp or ho outfit for pre-adolescents. Apparently I don't shop at the same stores as Gingrich.Getting back to video games, to quote David Cross, "What was the name of that video game Hitler used to play?"
Blog post has been Godwin'd.
In all seriousness, assigning blame to video games and movies always seemed quite odd to me. I remember hearing in English classes that distraught romantics would sometimes mimic the melancholy suicides of their favorite novel characters, but surely one would blame this act on their inability to distinguish fiction from reality rather than the work of fiction they were imitating. In truth, it makes more sense to blame the mental instability of a person for that person's actions rather than decrying long sessions of Halo and a love of Italian gore films. Heck, even Rush Limbaugh said that people shouldn't blame video games for the Virginia Tech tragedy since there a lot of gamers who aren't going to harm anyone. You know you're way off the mark when you make Rush fucking Limbaugh sound reasonable by comparison.
Perhaps it's easier for us to assign moral culpability to intimate objects rather than a responsible party, though it's funny that some of us are so willing to shirk personal responsibility in order to blame pixels, images, or words.
Shortsighted Gun Bans and Spur-Wearin' Gun Totin'
Then you have proponents of gun control calling for outright bans on the sale of guns thinking that by doing so an event like this would never have happened. Nothing could be further from the truth, of course, since banning the sale or ownership of guns will do nothing to stop crazy or immoral people from doing bad things. If guns were illegal and Cho wanted a gun, he would have gotten a gun somehow. Drugs are illegal but, lo and behold, you can still get them pretty easy. A ban on guns would accomplish nothing in this case. Also, I can't help but think about the black market for firearms and how that would expand if all guns were banned.The contrarian view is that people should be allowed to carry concealed firearms, which again ties into that action movie bravado I just can't fathom. Surely there would be more abuses of this ability to carry concealed weapons than there would be benefits; and surely during school shootings this would lead to more chaos. Think about it: During a school shooting, a bunch of people pull guns and look for the shooter. How is law enforcement supposed to tell the difference between the actual shooter and the guy who just watched Magnum Force the night before? Seriously, people, you are not Chow Yun-Fat and real life is not an action movie or a game of Wild Gunman.
Apart from BB guns, I've never shot or held an actual gun. I'm really in the middle of the issue on guns since I think people should be allowed to own guns within reason (i.e., I don't care if it's your birthday, you aren't getting an assault weapon), but I think there needs to be strict regulation and licensing of guns and their owners. Perhaps a strict psychological screening is in order for potential gun owners. Again, this is might not cut it since if people want guns they have different ways to get them.
Inevitably what this shows, though, is that there are no simple, convenient answers linked to this tragedy.
More on this topic in a day or two, featuring D'Souza, Barak Obama, and the Yale dean of student affairs, Betty Trachtenberg.








